Contents
Whose family are you here for?
Showing both families — every line on the page. Pick a side to hide the other
family's ancestors; Earl, Kristin and their three children stay on either way.
Person · Frances Tandy
The record
- HHomethe fan · what changed · open questions
- MMigrationbirths and deaths on a map, by decade
- TTimeline609 entries · 5 eras
- PPeople290 cards, by generationFrances Tandy
- LLines13 surname pages
The evidence
- DDocuments896 thumbnails, filterable
- SSourcesS1–S1207, with where each is cited
The findings
- How the wall came downProeger line
- The glass patentsProeger line
- How the Caffey half was closedCaffey line
- What the DNA saysits own page
- Four routesMigration
- The asymmetryLines
- Open questions20 questions
- Add to this recorda form, read by Earl
How to read this record
Every claim is tagged
Most family trees flatten everything into the same confident typeface. This one does not.
The three research tags below are the whole point of the exercise: they say what a document
proves, what the weight of evidence suggests, and what nobody has found yet. A fourth marks
what the family stated directly, where no document has been retrieved at all — it is kept
separate on purpose and is never quietly promoted to confirmed. A fifth, added on
13 September 2026, marks biological evidence: a DNA result is not a document, and it is not
testimony either. Two further labels mark where this page withholds information
rather than lacking it.
ConfirmedAttested by a document that was actually retrieved and read — a census sheet, a
government index, a grave marker, a family-written obituary.
ProbableStrongly supported but not nailed down: a user-contributed tree, a masked index field,
or a chain of consistent circumstances. Believable, not proven.
Not foundSearched for and not located. This is a statement about the search, not about the
person — the record may well exist somewhere unsearched.
Family testimonySupplied by the family and recorded on their word — no document has been retrieved for
it. Note the diamond rather than the dot: this is provenance, not proof, and it stands
apart from the three record tags above S24.
DNA evidenceBiological evidence consistent with a claim. It corroborates origins; it does
not by itself establish a person or a link. Note the bar rather than a dot or a diamond:
no DNA result on this page is ever counted as confirmed, because no document
was read for it S46.
Living — withheldThe person is living. By the privacy rule for this page, name and relationship are
shown, and at most a year the family has already published. Full dates of birth, ages,
places of residence and record identifiers are held back.
Research in progressA branch that is actively being worked on. The node exists in the structure so the
shape of the family is honest; the detail is simply not in yet.
Person · Frances Tandy
Skip to sources ↧- Died
- Not found
- Sources
- 3
Research status
Research status: PROBABLE — accepted by Earl 28 September 2026 pending more evidence. The DAR Lineage Book entry for Miss Lilla May Duncan (no. 112604) gives the line “James Quisenberry m. 1776 Jane Burris (1759–1811).
Thomas Burris m. Frances Tandy”, Thomas a sergeant in the 3rd Virginia regiment who died in Virginia in 1789
S751. Thomas Burrus's own will of 1788 names
his wife Frances, a son William Tandy and a daughter Frances Tandy Bush, besides “my daughter Jane Quisenberry”
S645. A 1940 SAR application by another Burrus descendant, Ollie Ezekiel Reed, was read too, but the image is only its cover and references sheet
S856. What is weak: only compiled lineage books give her maiden name as Tandy; the will names Thomas's wife Frances without a surname and does not say she was Jane's mother; FamilySearch has no independent record.
Evidence: DAR Lineage Book no. 112604 names Frances Tandy as Thomas Burris's wife in Jane Burris's numbered line, and Thomas Burrus's 1788 will names his wife Frances, a son William Tandy and a daughter Frances Tandy Bush. Weak or missing: Only compiled lineage books give her maiden name; the will gives no surname and does not say Frances was Jane's mother, and no original record has been found. Not yet confirmed. Know more? Confirm or correct this →
Life in the order the records give it
Birth—
Her birth and death dates, and the middle name some online trees give her, are not in any record read and are not used here
Open questions what is probable, weak or missing — confirm or correct it
Probable
Probable mother of
Jane Burris, and so grandmother of
Colby Burris Quisenberry; wife of Thomas Burris (Burrus) of Orange County, Virginia, whose will was written on 2 October 1788 and proved on 23 March 1789
S645In the record
Generation 9 — Earl's earliest known
- S645Will of Thomas Burrus, Orange County, Virginia, Will Book 3, pp. 190–191. Ancestry record 2478859. Image examined, read 25 September 2026. Confirmed Dated 2 October 1788, proved 23 March 1789. It names “my daughter Jane Quisenberry” and “my grand Daughter Frances Quisenberry the Daughter of Jane Quisenberry”; his wife Frances; sons Thomas, William Tandy and Roger; daughters Mourning, Fanny Embry, Mildred Embry(?), Elizabeth Brockman, Sally Tribble and Frances Tandy Bush.
- S751DAR Lineage Book, p. 197, no. 112604: Miss Lilla May Duncan. Ancestry record 3494636. Image examined, read 26 September 2026. Probable Descent through Joyce Quisenberry (b. 1777) and James Duncan to “James Quisenberry m. 1776 Jane Burris (1759–1811)”, daughter of Thomas Burris and Frances Tandy; Thomas Burris a sergeant in the 3rd Virginia, died in Virginia in 1789. A compiled lineage book.
- S856U.S., Sons of the American Revolution Membership Applications — national no. 59852 (DC Society), Ollie Ezekiel Reed, descendant of Thomas Burrus, 1940–41. Ancestry collection 2204, record 1241690 (image 32596_242525-00115). Image examined, read 28 September 2026. Probable Filed 30 December 1940, approved 6 February 1941. The image is the cover and references sheet: DAR nos. 214648, 274802, 257708 [228504], Gleanings of Virginia History p. 193, the Henley Genealogy (W. B. Henley, Amherst County, 1880), and the 1782 Virginia census p. 19. The lineage page is not on this image, so it does not itself name Frances Tandy; it points to the references a later search can use.
Top